On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 17:10:49 -0500 Jeff Garzik <[email protected]> wrote:
> I was thinking specifically that chunkd may want the in-progress xfer > codes changes in your patch. chunkd, tabled, nfs4d (and ancient > storaged) all share the same basic write-in-progress and TCP data xfer code. > > I'll take a look, no need to worry about it yourself. At least 1 of the 3 that I fixed definitely was a corruption that I introduced to your design when I adapted it to simultaneous streaming on write. Not sure about other two, but maybe I just screwed tabled. But sure, if you have a moment to re-check chunkd, be my guest. -- Pete -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe hail-devel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
