If block size should be variable and determined by user, it'll have a temporary character.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Samuel Guo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it is better to let blocksize to be configured. > > even, the blocksize may be fit with the cpu L1 cache (1M, or 2M) which will > make the in-memory block computation(addtion, multiplication) . > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 7:57 PM, Edward J. Yoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> Oh, Problem is a block size. BlockedDenseMatrix seems better. >> >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Edward J. Yoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> > To handle large matrix, maybe we should block-level store the matrix >> > as a blocked dense matrix. Of course, the more memory will be used for >> > get/set (i, j). >> > >> > -- >> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @ NHN, corp. >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > http://blog.udanax.org >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @ NHN, corp. >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://blog.udanax.org >> > -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @ NHN, corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blog.udanax.org
