[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12655497#action_12655497
 ] 

Hudson commented on HAMA-130:
-----------------------------

+1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12395794/HAMA-130_v01.patch
against trunk revision 725535.

    @author +1.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    tests included +1.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

    javadoc +1.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

    javac +1.  The applied patch does not generate any new javac compiler 
warnings.

    release audit +1.  The applied patch does not generate any new release 
audit warnings.

    findbugs +1.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings.

    core tests +1.  The patch passed core unit tests.

Test results: 
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hama-Patch/128/testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hama-Patch/128/artifact/trunk/build/reports/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Checkstyle results: 
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hama-Patch/128/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html
Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hama-Patch/128/console

This message is automatically generated.

> Computing Block's range will miss some cell during blocking.
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HAMA-130
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-130
>             Project: Hama
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: implementation
>    Affects Versions: 0.1.0
>            Reporter: Samuel Guo
>            Assignee: Samuel Guo
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.1.0
>
>         Attachments: HAMA-130.patch, HAMA-130_v01.patch
>
>
> As the code below, in *BlockingMapper*, we compute the block's col range in a 
> loop. 
> if the block's size can integer-divide the matrix' column size, it is right.
> but if the block's size can not integer-divide the matrix' column size, some 
> cells will be missed.
> for (int i = 0; i < mBlockNum; i++) {
>         startColumn = i * mBlockColSize;
>         endColumn = startColumn + mBlockColSize - 1;
>         output.collect(new BlockID(blkRow, i), new VectorWritable(key.get(),
>             dv.subVector(startColumn, endColumn)));
> }
> for examples:
> if the block num is 3,  the matrix is 100 * 100. mBlockSize = 100 / 3 = 33.
> then <0 ~ 32>, <33 ~ 65>, <66 ~ 98> will be counted. At the same time we will 
> lose column 99.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to