Don't worry about it. It is for the "PPMC", which is the podling equivalent of 
a PMC. You can read more about the differences on the Foundation's web site. It 
only sees very limited use and is for discussing rare issues that must be 
private (it is not for technical discussion). This (hama-dev) list is the sole 
location needed for anyone wanting to contribute to the project.

Edward has just broken one of the "silent rules" of list etiquette by posting 
to both a public and private list (and then cross-posting to another public 
list). While in this case it hasn't meant any private posts got replied to in 
public, it does become a bit confusing as you've seen. IMO it's better to post 
to the relevant list with the context they need rather than cross-posting in 
general :)

Cheers,
Brett

On 29/04/2010, at 3:54 PM, Hyunsik Choi wrote:

> Can I read archives of hama-private mailling list?
> I didn't heard about hama-private mailling list :(
> I just subscribed hama-private mailling list.
> 
> Best regards,
> --
> Hyunsik Choi
> Database & Information Systems Group, Korea Univ.
> http://diveintodata.org
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]>wrote:
> 
>> FYI, My (ASF) activities will be restricted in my day-job w/ dry
>> atmosphere. :/
>> 
>> However, my individual activities will be fine.
>> 
>> Edward,
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]>
>> Date: Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 4:59 PM
>> Subject: Re: Regarding retraction of a CCLA agreement
>> To: [email protected], [email protected]
>> 
>> 
>>> However, I believe all your employer has to do is
>>> submit a new schedule A that lists no one to
>>> effectively limit future contributions (see section 8).
>> 
>> All right, Thanks for your advice. :)
>> 
>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> The copyright license and patent license are irrevocable. Any
>> contributions you have made can't be taken back. However, I believe all your
>> employer has to do is submit a new schedule A that lists no one to
>> effectively limit future contributions (see section 8).
>>> 
>>> Ralph
>>> 
>>> On Apr 26, 2010, at 11:35 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Dear legal community and Hama mentors,
>>>> 
>>>> NHN, corp., which is my full-time employment has signed a CCLA to be
>>>> able to commit to the ASF code repository and also to clarify the
>>>> intellectual properties, almost 2 years ago.
>>>> 
>>>> Things changed. My current company wants to retract the Apache CCLA
>>>> agreement, And Now I can’t do any work for the ASF during my day job
>>>> at NHN, corp.
>>>> 
>>>> BTW, since I just found this -
>>>> 
>> http://markmail.org/message/mvimvs5otzax5rzo#query:ccla%20retraction+page:1+mid:uukdzhlzo2forpej+state:results
>> ,
>>>> so I was wondering if it is possible to retract the CCLA.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> --
>>>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://blog.udanax.org
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> [email protected]
>> http://blog.udanax.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> [email protected]
>> http://blog.udanax.org
>> 

--
Brett Porter
[email protected]
http://brettporter.wordpress.com/




Reply via email to