[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12867070#action_12867070
]
Hyunsik Choi commented on HAMA-244:
-----------------------------------
http://markmail.org/search/?q=To+committers+list:org.apache.incubator.hama-dev#query:To%20committers%20list%3Aorg.apache.incubator.hama-dev+page:1+mid:set4leqwvsbhg4ys+state:results
We already discussed 0.2 plan. The issues that we discussed was written in
http://wiki.apache.org/hama/RoadMap. Subscribers of hama-dev mailling list may
know what we are doing for v0.2. I also wrote my plan for HAMA-251. But, I have
not received any comment.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-251?focusedCommentId=12865430&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_12865430
If you mean that documentation is not sufficient. In open source communities,
the following sequence is not bad: 1) discussion 2) implementation 3)
documentation. It is because 1) many people contribute to open source projects
due to only fun 2) actually many issues in open sources are addressed in that
sequence.
If we have some problem, that may be we are lack of communication.
> Consider more simplified BSP programming interface
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HAMA-244
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-244
> Project: Hama
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: bsp
> Affects Versions: 0.2.0
> Reporter: Edward J. Yoon
> Assignee: Edward J. Yoon
> Fix For: 0.2.0
>
> Attachments: HAMA-244_v01.patch
>
>
> Perhaps, every BSP program will be consists of three steps such as,
> initialization, SPMD code implementation, and finalization from developer
> angle.
> However, currently there is no interface layer so users have to do all the
> works w/o any guide.
> Would be nice if it allow to use a more simplified interface.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
