+1 but a quick question. Will we completely drop ant build process?
-----Original message----- From:Alois Cochard <[email protected]> To:[email protected] Date:Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:35:24 +0200 Subject:Re: We'll use the maven build for Hama 0.3 +1 And maven provide flexibility when building using the plugins system... we can expect to use it in future 2011/4/15 Mikl鏀 Erd幨yi <[email protected]> > +1 > > Let's do it the right way ;-) > Copying jars between here and there is not trendy. > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 2:30 AM, Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> > wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Tommaso Teofili > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 :-) > >> > >> And agree with Eric, Maven is already here and we can use it to handle > >> different build requirements. > >> Regards, > >> Tommaso > >> > >> 2011/4/14 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> > >> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> We'll use the maven build for Hama 0.3 and remove the 'lib' directory. > >>> > >>> And, I would like to remove GroboUtils dependency (for multi-threaded > >>> testing). Instead, we can use a MiniBSPCluster/LocalBSPJobRunner. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > >>> http://blog.udanax.org > >>> http://twitter.com/eddieyoon > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > > http://blog.udanax.org > > http://twitter.com/eddieyoon > > > -- *Alois Cochard* http://aloiscochard.blogspot.com http://twitter.com/aloiscochard -- ChiaHung Lin Department of Information Management National University of Kaohsiung Taiwan
