Actually I'm +1 with that, I wanted to implement this right from the start, but there were some issues why I didn't do that. In fact you can change the path, so the threadpoolsize wouldn't be a problem (I hope so :D).
2011/5/12 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> > Hi all > > In LocalBSPRunner, Runtime.availableProcessor will retuns the num of > logical CPU's. Too small number. > > What do u think about increasing the num of threadPoolSize to ten times? > > Thanks > > Sent from my iPhone > > Begin forwarded message: > > > From: Chris Willmore <[email protected]> > > Date: 2011년 5월 10일 오후 6시 32분 51초 KST > > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > Subject: Running mutiple tasks in local mode > > Reply-To: [email protected] > > Reply-To: Chris Willmore <[email protected]> > > > > > Hi All, > > > > I am playing around with the examples in local mode, but cannot figure > out how, or if it is even possible, to run more than 2 peers for a job. > > > > I'ved tried running: > > bin/hama jar hama-examples.jar pi <num> > > > > with various values of num, but it seems it is disregarded and always 2 > are run (one master peer and one additional). > > Can I run and test locally with num > 2? > > > > Also, I was wondering how the number of peers concurrently running on a > given groom server are controlled. Is it configurable? > > > > Regards, > > Chris > -- Thomas Jungblut Berlin mobile: 0170-3081070 business: [email protected] private: [email protected]
