Oh.. Thanks. Then, let's try monthly!
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Steve Loughran <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/08/2011 12:07 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Other open source projects seems releases periodically and *shortly*. >> Frankly, I don't know what's the best. >> >> Should we also release Hama periodically and *shortly*? or should we >> release at significant changes? >> > > I'd go for fast and regular, at least during dev. On one part of the > SmartFrog project, I was doing a release a fortnight, with a CentOS VM set > up to do the release process while I could continue coding on my desktop > > http://smartfrog.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/smartfrog/trunk/core/release/doc/creating_release_artifacts.odt > > That forced a two week cycle, one week for features, one week to stabilise. > > Something less agressive, but monthly is good > -keeps the release process on its toes, encourages automation (the only bit > I have to do by hand is patching the JIRA change list into the (generated > from template) release notes. > -keeps awareness up, that this is a live project > -gets the build in the hands of the users > -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon
