As far as I can recall, there was no conclusion. http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg03742.html
and "ϕ accrual failure detector" also. On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:46 AM, ChiaHung Lin <[email protected]> wrote: > I remember there was discussion that Hama would not adapt to MR-279. Is this > still the case? > > -----Original message----- > From:Steve Loughran <[email protected]> > To:[email protected] > Date:Wed, 08 Jun 2011 12:15:14 +0100 > Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Rearrange our roadmap > > On 06/08/2011 06:22 AM, Edward J. Yoon wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I would suggest that we have to focus on performance improvements and >> basic communication parts of BSP framework. So I've little edited our >> roadmap page. >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/hama/RoadMap >> >> If you have any comments or other opinions, let's discuss here. >> >> Thanks. > > I'd recommend targeting running the fault tolerant code under the MR-279 > engine (hadoop 0.22 or .23?), as this will deploy more than just the MR > engine, and handle liveness -so you don't need to replicate core modules. > > the big thing for BSP engines is checkpointing, where the sync point > becomes the thing you can checkpoint. > > > -- > ChiaHung Lin > Department of Information Management > National University of Kaohsiung > Taiwan > -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon
