This sounds great. Any chance to share such experience? That would be good to learn from real practice.
-----Original message----- From:Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> To:[email protected] Date:Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:23:49 +0900 Subject:Re: Cutting a 0.3-incubating release Going to try and roll up RC1 tonight. Now I'm testing Hama cluster on physical 32 nodes. On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Thomas Jungblut <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > 2011/6/15 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> > >> Thanks for noticing that! >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:54 AM, ChiaHung Lin <[email protected]> wrote: >> > As roadmap plans in wiki, it seems that HAMA-370 can be removed because >> it is more related to fault tolerance issue. >> > >> > -----Original message----- >> > From:Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> >> > To:[email protected] >> > Date:Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:39:17 +0900 >> > Subject:Cutting a 0.3-incubating release >> > >> > Hi all, >> > >> > As steve mentioned, we might want to release a 0.3 soon. >> > >> > We've added some new features (web UI, message bundle, BSP examples) >> > and fixed bunch of bugs. Moreover, vote process seems VERY slow. >> > >> > After all opened issues[1] are solved, I'd like to open the vote for >> > Hama 0.3-incubating release. >> > >> > What do you think? >> > >> > 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA/fixforversion/12315100 >> > >> > -- >> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >> > @eddieyoon >> > >> > >> > -- >> > ChiaHung Lin >> > Department of Information Management >> > National University of Kaohsiung >> > Taiwan >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >> @eddieyoon >> > > > > -- > Thomas Jungblut > Berlin > > mobile: 0170-3081070 > > business: [email protected] > private: [email protected] > -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon -- ChiaHung Lin Department of Information Management National University of Kaohsiung Taiwan
