> > I've heard the barrier synchronization was the greatest "barrier" to > scaling their solution with HAMA.
Oh really? I can swear someone told me yesterday that ZooKeeper is fine?;)) If you're interested, you could ask for the HAMA patch that did the tricks > ;-) Sure, I think it is quite sad that they did not share their researched problems with us. 2011/10/17 Miklós Erdélyi <[email protected]> > The paper was prepared by the group that I also worked with before. As > I've heard the barrier synchronization was the greatest "barrier" to > scaling their solution with HAMA. They had to also overcome memory > problems with message buffering. > If you're interested, you could ask for the HAMA patch that did the tricks > ;-) > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> looks like my university (Roma Tre) was deeply involved there, will try > to > >> have some other feedback personally :) > > > > Haha, don't abandon us what they say, tommaso. Just kidding. It would > > be really nice if we could get feedback from them. :) > > > > P.S., The paper is published at QDB workshop at VLDB'11. > > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Tommaso Teofili > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> looks like my university (Roma Tre) was deeply involved there, will try > to > >> have some other feedback personally :) > >> Tommaso > >> > >> 2011/10/17 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> > >> > >>> http://qdb2011.dia.uniroma3.it/participants/program/p11-SIDLO.pdf > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > >>> @eddieyoon > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > > @eddieyoon > > > -- Thomas Jungblut Berlin <[email protected]>
