>> HAMA-438 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-438> Generate Hama >> config files from build -> Does this really belong to 0.4.0? How important >> is this?
I don't know exactly at the moment but, some files should be moved 'resources' directory and we have to learn about automated deployment with maven before 0.4 release vote. HAMA-438 also should be fixed at this stage. On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd like to manage releases at least for a while, because I'm a active > early customer in real world. However, it would really help if someone > could help me out. > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Thomas Jungblut > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Great, thank you. >> >> Let's cleanup the issues in the queue. >> >> I think these issues are not a must-have for 0.4.0: >> HAMA-466 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-466> Refactoring to >> clean code -> (Ongoing efford) >> HAMA-477 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-477> Refactor the Hama >> examples tests -> (Ongoing efford) >> HAMA-470 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-470> The Web Ui should >> contain the version number -> Don't think this is really necessary for >> 0.4.0. Although it is a nice feature. >> HAMA-445 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-445> Make configurable >> checkpointing -> Checkpointing is deactivated and is useless without really >> restarting the tasks (fault tolerance). So we can cut this. >> HAMA-438 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-438> Generate Hama >> config files from build -> Does this really belong to 0.4.0? How important >> is this? >> HAMA-447 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-447> Apply Findbugs >> and stuff -> (Ongoing efford) >> >> With cutting these from the roadmap we just have 9 issues left, which are >> quite straight forward. 2-3 of them already contain patches. >> What do you think? >> >> BTW who is release manager? Edward? >> >> 2011/11/28 Chia-Hung Lin <[email protected]> >> >>> I committed the patch for HAMA-363. >>> >>> Please let me know if anything in terms of this. >>> >>> On 28 November 2011 19:03, Thomas Jungblut >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > It is very convenient for the user to view log files within the web >>> > frontend. >>> > But this is quite a large issue, so I'm not sure. >>> > +-0 >>> > >>> > 2011/11/28 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> >>> > >>> >> Hmm, Should we add HAMA-442 to 0.4 release? >>> >> >>> >> 2011/11/27 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]>: >>> >> > +1 >>> >> > >>> >> > Sent from my iPhone >>> >> > >>> >> > On 2011. 11. 26., at 오후 8:21, Thomas Jungblut < >>> >> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> >> Hey all, I would like to freeze the new features for 0.4.0 from now >>> on. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> The features that should be done before 0.4.0 release would be: >>> >> >>> HAMA-479 Add Counters to Hama Jobs >>> >> >>> HAMA-363 Add network condition monitoring >>> >> >> >>> >> >> What do you think? >>> >> >> >>> >> >> -- >>> >> >> Thomas Jungblut >>> >> >> Berlin <[email protected]> >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >>> >> @eddieyoon >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Thomas Jungblut >>> > Berlin <[email protected]> >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thomas Jungblut >> Berlin <[email protected]> >> > > > > -- > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > @eddieyoon -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon
