This vote passes as follows (*, ** marks an PMC, IPMC vote) :

+1 Thomas Jungblut *
+1 Apurv Verma
+1 Edward J. Yoon *
+1 Suraj Menon
+1 Tommaso Teofili **
+1 ChiaHung Lin *

Thanks for the votes!

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Chia-Hung Lin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Do not have enough time to test. Just run test cases. As the release
> is based on previous release candidates, with which most of the tests
> worked ok. So basically I am fine with it. +1
>
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Reactor Summary:
> [INFO]
> [INFO] Apache Hama parent POM ............................ SUCCESS [0.560s]
> [INFO] core .............................................. SUCCESS [44.689s]
> [INFO] graph ............................................. SUCCESS [0.638s]
> [INFO] examples .......................................... SUCCESS [26.647s]
> [INFO] dist .............................................. SUCCESS [8.262s]
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> On 13 February 2012 20:02, Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Everything looks good to me.
>> +1
>> Tommaso
>>
>> 2012/2/12 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]>
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Here's Hama 0.4 RC4.
>>>
>>> Artifacts is:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.4-RC4/
>>>
>>> And, SVN Tag is:
>>>
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC4/
>>>
>>> Should we release RC4? Please vote!
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>> --
>>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>>> @eddieyoon
>>>



-- 
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon

Reply via email to