Nathan Weizenbaum wrote: > No, it's not a bad idea... we should probably do that next time we > reorganize the repository. > > - Nathan > > shaners o matic 8000 wrote: >> its certainly possible. but i'm not real sure. >> either way, its not a horrible idea to have the plugin folder actually >> named 'haml' >> >> i gotta say, i'm really loving haml so far. >> thanks a boat load.
will there be a feature for haml executable to give rails plugin so that we can simply get it from just haml from rubygems .. ? moreover, i hope one day, rails executable will give options for making haml special by default (not rhtml by default). -- Arie Kusuma Atmaja A.K.A Arie A.K.A ariekeren / YM! = riyari3 http://ariekusumaatmaja.wordpress.com http://groups.yahoo.com/groups/id-ruby http://groups-beta.google.com/group/id-jp # mari praktik bercakap jepang! http://groups-beta.google.com/group/id-fr # mari praktik bercakap prancis! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
