And indication of performance differences, (-5%? , same?, better ?). I would be interested to know cause I'm starting the conversion myself for our stuff.
Haml is really clean, thanks hampton - Martin On Feb 7, 5:25 pm, "s.ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brain cramp! Brain cramp! > > http://calicowebdev.com > > On Feb 7, 2007, at 2:22 PM, Hampton wrote: > > > > > Linky! > > > Linky! > > > On 2/7/07, s.ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I must confess that I never get around to my own web site, and it's > >> been gnawing at me. Over the weekend, I redesigned it using Haml and > >> Sass for most everything. There is still some retrograde rhtml in a > >> few places, but the outward-facing stuff is all Haml and the only > >> stylesheets are Sass-generated. > > >> I'm totally sold on Haml and Sass! > > >> Steve --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
