On Mar 7, 3:11 am, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem with the first case is that you're not properly creating the
> attributes hash. It's a literal Ruby hash, so you use "=>" to associate
> values with names.
of course you are right.. that's weird. sorry dumb question.
> There already is an ERB filter (accessed by :erb, unsurprisingly), but
yes, this is what i meant, and what i tried to use.
> at the moment, filters don't have the capability of accessing runtime
> information about the template, and Ruby code evaluated in the :erb and
> :ruby filters doesn't run in the current ActionView instance. This will
> probably be changed in upcoming releases.
ok, thanks, that would be greate.
also, could you please clarify why i shouldn't write .{:attribute =>
"value"}? it does work at the moment, will it be deprecated in future
releases?
andi
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
