Ah i see - that makes sense - tho it seems an unnessessary barrier - I still keep putting the colons in the wrong place :)
I don't know if the :'s really add much glancability since indentation take care of most cases. css2sass is great - but often im converting snippets of css - doesnt make sense to bring out the big guns. On Apr 5, 8:51 am, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This syntax was chosen so that it would be easy to visually distinguish > attribute declarations when glancing at a document. It's conceivable > that in a later version, an alternate syntax will be added. > > Note that in trunk, there's a css2sass utility that should be able to > convert CSS to Sass, as the name suggests. It's nesting-handling is a > little buggy at the moment, but it works well for the most part. > > - Nathan > > weepy wrote: > > Hi > > > Just wondering why sass syntax is : > > > p > > :font-color red > > .heading > > :background green > > > as opposed to the more obvious > > > p > > font-color: red > > .heading > > background: green > > > would make it alot easier to convert css by hand (which I often find > > my self doing) > > > cheers > > > Jonah --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
