buffer.rb:202
id = "#{class_name}_#{ref.id}"
Should that be something like this?
id = ref.respond_to?(:new_record?) && ref.new_record? ?
"new_#{class_name}" : "#{class_name}_#{ref.id}"
Then, presumably, this:
%form[x]= "Cats!"
would produce:
<form id="new_cat">Cats!</form>
or
<form id="cat_3">Cats!</form>
when x is a cat (depending on whether it had been stored or not),
which seems more in-line with form_for (it was definitely what I had
expected).
Nick
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
