I personally kind of like the splayed-out version. When each is on a new line. It reads easier to me.
I don't really see the one-liner as being easier to understand---- Maybe I'm smoking too much crack though. -hampton. On 5/26/07, gberz3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You're absolutely right. I suppose I'm just hoping for some sort of > compromise. Perhaps we could use escapes? > > -Michael > > On May 26, 8:41 pm, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, there are several issues with this. First, it is sort of against > > the structural ideas of Haml. Also, it's ambiguous... that could just as > > easily be interpreted as <tr>%td "stuff" %td "stuff" %td "stuff"</tr>. > > > > - Nathan > > > > gberz3 wrote: > > > I know, I know, I'm likely defeating the entire purpose of HAML, yet, > > > I can't not say something. I'm looking to put tags on the same line > > > for both space savings as well as intuitive reading. For instance, > > > I'd like to be able to say the following: > > > > > %html > > > %body > > > %table > > > %tr %td "stuff" %td "stuff" %td "stuff > > > > > . . .instead of: > > > > > %html > > > %body > > > %table > > > %tr > > > %td "stuff" > > > %td "stuff" > > > %td "stuff" > > > > > This would save space and, in some cases, be easier to decipher. Of > > > course, I'm not the one behind the code. Thoughts? > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
