My restore comment: I don't really understand the argument for deletion. Is popularity a criterion for keeping an article in Wikipedia? When article deletion/ inclusion becomes a popularity contest I think we cross into dangerous territory. The question then becomes "How popular must a topic be to deserve a Wikipedia article?" which, in my opinion, is far too subjective a measure of an article's merit. A more appropriate question to ask would be "Is the article accurate and does it provide information that a certain segment of knowledge-seekers in the world would find helpful?" and I think it is clear from the response thus far that this particular article passes that test.
~Ross On Jun 5, 10:47 am, Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Whoops! > > I should probably put in the link for the review! > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Haml > > Everyone make sure to stay polite and official. You don't have to say > much more than "Restore" and a small reason why. > > Peace! > Hampton. > > On 6/5/07, Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hey guys- > > > Apparently an editor at wikipedia decided that they should delete the > > Haml page..... The discussion is going on right now. If you are a > > member of Wikipedia, would you please go and throw your support behind > > keeping the article alive! > > > -hampton. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
