Well, then in this instance, I'd just wrap it all in something called
common.... and just style 4 to override that.
.common
.one
.two
.three
.four
:override-shit
-hampton.
On 6/6/07, twifkak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 6, 3:02 am, Evgeny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why not use two classes for an element?
>
> 'Cause that pollutes the HTML, and because it doesn't scale when you
> want to go past one level of abstraction. Say you have:
>
> <div class="one common"/>
> <div class="two common"/>
> <div class="three even-more-common"/>
> <div class="four"/>
>
> And you realize that all .common need .even-more-common, as well.
>
> (Having, yet again, failed to snip some *real* code from work...)
>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
