Excellent thanks, I'll go through and change everything.
BTW maybe that should be documented somewhere WRT open and puts, as it
is not immediately obvious.
Thanks
On Jul 8, 2:41 pm, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A "-". Generally, if the helper directly outputs to the buffer (like
> open and puts, as well as form_for and some other built-in helpers), the
> results shouldn't be output. We're nice enough to return nil so it won't
> be rendered anyway, but that won't always be the case.
>
> - Nathan
>
> wolfmanjm wrote:
> > Another question...
>
> > Should a helper that uses open and puts be called with a - or = ?
>
> > ie
> > - mycoolhelper
> > or
> > = mycoolhelper
>
> > as both work, I just wanted to not be deprecated in the future :)
>
> > On Jul 8, 12:19 pm, wolfmanjm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Thanks, I wasn't stuck I just used puts "<hr/>" but it seemed a little
> >> inconsistent :)
>
> >> Maybe I should rephrase this as a feature request ;)
>
> >> On Jul 8, 12:14 pm, "s.ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>> This patch should solve your problem. Just use:
>
> >>> open 'hr /'
>
> >>> instead of the symbol. Note: this does not interpolate the
> >>> attributes ... just thought it might get you going if you were stuck.
>
> >>> 258c258,259
> >>> <
> >>> ---
>
> >>> > name = name.to_s
> >>> 268c269
> >>> < puts "</#{name}>"
> >>> ---
> >>> > puts "</#{name}>" unless name[-1].chr == '/'
>
> >>> On Jul 8, 2007, at 12:05 PM, wolfmanjm wrote:
>
> >>>> It is cleaner.
>
> >>>> I was wondering shouldn't...
>
> >>>> open :hr
>
> >>>> generate
>
> >>>> <hr/>
>
> >>>> rather than
>
> >>>> <hr>
> >>>> </hr>
>
> >>>> or do I just do
>
> >>>> puts "<hr/>
>
> >>>> ??
>
> >>>> On Jul 8, 9:31 am, Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>>>> The open stuff is pretty killer. Makes your helpers MUCH MUCH
> >>>>> cleaner.
>
> >>>>> I use them all the time now.
>
> >>>>> -hampton.
>
> >>>>> On 7/8/07, wolfmanjm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> thanks thats better ;)
>
> >>>>>> On Jul 7, 8:20 pm, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> Huh... it appears that the link was broken. Try this one instead:
>
> >>>>>>http://haml.hamptoncatlin.com/docs/rdoc/classes/Haml/Helpers/
> >>>>>> ActionVi....
>
> >>>>>>> Note that that class doesn't have what you're looking for. I was
> >>>>>>> referring to the "open" helper, which is in Haml::Helpers
> >>>>>>> (
>
> >>>>>>http://haml.hamptoncatlin.com/docs/rdoc/classes/Haml/
> >>>>>> Helpers.html#M00...).
>
> >>>>>>> Note that it /wasn't/ documented there until I uploaded the most
> >>>>>>> recent
> >>>>>>> documentation just now, so if you looked there earlier and
> >>>>>>> didn't find
> >>>>>>> anything that's why.
>
> >>>>>>> - Nathan
>
> >>>>>>> wolfmanjm wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> Hi,
>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks for the new 1.7
>
> >>>>>>>> This new feature intrigued me...
>
> >>>>>>>> Haml helpers to allow you to write elegantly formatted HTML in
> >>>>>>>> your
> >>>>>>>> helpers.
>
> >>>>>>>> So I looked for docs on how to use it, but this link returned
> >>>>>>>> an error
>
> >>>>>>>>http://haml.hamptoncatlin.com/docs/Haml/Helpers/
> >>>>>>>> ActionViewExtensions..
>
> >>>>>> ..
>
> >>>>>>>> Are there any examples of how to use this feature? It sounds
> >>>>>>>> just like
> >>>>>>>> what I need.
>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
