No, please complain! That's how we make it better. We've talked about eliminating the difference between SassScript and static attributes, but it creates too much ambiguity. How does one handle "!important"? "repeat-x"? There are just too many potential hard-to-track-down conflicts where someone will think they're doing something non-dynamic and it'll end up having the wrong effect.
- Nathan Geoff Evason wrote: > Thanks Mislav, > > As I mentioned in my post, I already found a way to make it work. I > guess I was just more concerned with the way the code looks. > > I'm sure it's just a matter of preference, but to me: > > background-color: transparent > color: = !my_color > float: right > > seems more consistent then: > > background-color: transparent > color = !my_color > float: right > > Actually - getting rid of the '=' for the use of a constant would be > the bees knees in my opinion: > > !my_color = #fff > > .my_div > float: right > color: !my_color > > But hey, I guess I shouldn't complain. HAML & SASS are already saving > me heaps of time anyway.. > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
