And apparently I do not pay enough attention and attributes without
values are not legal xhtml.  So the point is totally moot.  Ignore me,
I need some sleep.

-Tom

On Jul 23, 11:33 pm, Tom Bagby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In response to myself, having nil eliminate the attribute is kind of
> nice specifically for this checked attribute case.  Makes having it
> conditionally checked much simpler.  However, it means I can't really
> think of a way to express leaving the attribute value off entirely.
> Oh well.
>
> On Jul 23, 11:21 pm, Tom Bagby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks very much.  I agree that there should be a difference.  The
> > patch as submitted needs to also handle build_attributes in Buffer as
> > well.  Maybe now is the time to make a single build_attributes class
> > method, Nathan?
>
> > There is another interpretation of nil attributes that I think I
> > prefer.  There is currently no way to add attributes without values.
> > Like
>
> > <input type=checkbox checked>
>
> > You have to assign a dummy value for the checked attribute, which
> > works, but is not really correct.  I've really wanted to have that
> > available and I'm not sure of another syntax that would work for it.
> > Also, I think this case might be more common than wanting to
> > conditionally eliminate attributes.  Opinions?
>
> > -Tom
>
> > On Jul 23, 7:40 am, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Agreed. I'll try to apply it tonight.
>
> > > - Nathan
>
> > > Mislav Marohnić wrote:
> > > > On 7/23/07, *Jan Szumiec* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> > > >     I found that haml currently doesn't distinguish between nil and 
> > > > empty
> > > >     ("") attributes which seems to me a little bit weird.
>
> > > > This is a serious issue!
> > > > +1 for your patch


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to