Using Haml is simple.
As in most software, adding features is a bad thing, unless the
features are really necessary. This feature just screams YAGNI and
over-engineering all over it.
On 7/25/07, Vlad Rafeyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think this should be possible in some kind of helpers, or methods in
> my controller. Or any place in *my application*, and not in the source
> code of HAML.
>
> HAML source is confusing for me, because:
> 1. I'm not a developer
> 2. I don't know, now plugins work. And how to rewrite them.
>
> But I do know how to write simple app on RoR with models, controllers
> and helpers. And HAML will win, if this kind of users can extend it
> with their own syntax and methods. That's it.
>
> On Jul 23, 6:53 am, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The Haml source isn't that confusing. You should be able to add in
> > something like that fairly easily.
> >
> > - Nathan
> >
> > Vlad Rafeyev wrote:
> > > ok, let's not force everybody to use this strange syntax.
> >
> > > But what about my own strange syntax for me only? What if I set some
> > > kind of prefix and define logic myself? Like in the example above.
> >
> > > On Jul 22, 4:59 pm, Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >> The real problem is that partials usually have slashes in them when
> > >> they aren't in the same folder, and that starts to get messy.
> >
> > >> _users/question_one{:var1 => "var1"}
> >
> > >> I mean, I do find myself doing that pattern often, but I just don't
> > >> know if its *too much*. Like, too specific to what Rail's is doing and
> > >> too liable to break.
> >
> > >> Let me think about it more.
> >
> > >> -hampton.
> >
> > >> On 7/22/07, Vlad Rafeyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >>> Don't you think, that
> >
> > >>> - partial :question_one, { :var1 => 'var1' }
> >
> > >>> sounds much worse than
> >
> > >>> _question_one{:var1 => "var1"}
> >
> > >>> ?
> >
> > >>> Especially then we talk about Haiku :)
> >
> > >>> On Jul 22, 2:18 pm, Evgeny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >>>> I believe the answer of every guru will be - "Use a helper!"
> >
> > >>>> That would give you syntax that is more consistent with everything
> > >>>> else haml, and will probably look something like this :
> > >>>> - partial :question_one, { :var1 => 'var1' }
> > >>>> Or whatever else you want it to look like.
> >
> > >>>> I for one would not want Haml to be too extendable, with custom tags
> > >>>> for example.
> >
> > >>>> On 7/22/07, Vlad Rafeyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >>>>> Hello, kind HAML gurus and developers!
> >
> > >>>>> I use this code very often:
> >
> > >>>>> = render :partial => "question_one", :locals => {:var1 => "var1"}
> >
> > >>>>> But what if I want to use my own type of HAML tags? For example like
> > >>>>> this:
> >
> > >>>>> _question_one{:var1 => "var1"}
> >
> > >>>>> Is it possible to add new types of tags? If so, how?
> >
> > >>>>> Thank you!
>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
