ok... Thanx. Just wanted to check :) On 8/10/07, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You're right that in a few experiments, ugly-Haml did perform very well. > However, that was a very rough mock-up, not really fit for inclusion in > the standard codebase. It will be added at some point, but it's not > there yet. > > - Nathan > > Daniel N wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've read somewhere that by running haml without the nice spacing in > > the output there is a pretty serious performance boost. I seem to > > remember that this was done in a development env. Is there a way to > > turn it off? I couldn't find one in the docs > > > > I can't remember where I read that so I could be just full of crap. > > Hope not :) > > > > Thanx > > Daniel > > > > > > > > > >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
