By way of example, the last bit of your example would have rendered as

<div id="footer">
  <p>
    <All>content copyright (c) Bob</All>
  </p>
</div>

See? It gets confusing.

- Nathan

Hampton wrote:
> The % was chosen because I wanted to be able to have plain tetxt lines
>
>
> %title
>   content
>
> title
>   content
>
> Tags are explicit instead of implicit. And, I wanted to be able to
> keep it more freeform.
>
> Percent was chosen particularily because its SHIFT-5 which isn't too
> hard to hit.
>
> -hampton.
>
> On 8/19/07, jc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> I'm new to HAML and a big fan of it so far. Converted my rails app to
>> HAML in about 2 hours and am really happy with the look of it.
>> However, I searched the group to find any discussion on what the
>> reasoning for using the % symbol for defining elements. I don't mind
>> it, but it seems to be that there's a much cleaner and obvious way to
>> formatting HAML.
>>
>> Using the wikipedia example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haml
>>
>> Why not format it as the following?
>>
>> !!!rspec
>> html{ :xmlns => "http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";, :lang => "en",
>> 'xml:lang' => "en" }
>>   head
>>     title BoBlog
>>     meta{ 'http-equiv' => 'Content-Type', :content => 'text/html;
>> charset=utf-8' }/
>>     = stylesheet_link_tag 'main'
>>   body
>>     #header
>>       h1 BoBlog
>>       h2 Bob's Blog
>>     #content
>>       - @entries.each do |entry|
>>         .entry
>>           h3.title= entry.title
>>           p.date= entry.posted.strftime("%A, %B %d, %Y")
>>           p.body= entry.body
>>     #footer
>>       p
>>         All content copyright (c) Bob
>>
>> Is that harder to parse? Is it more of an implementation or a style
>> issue?
>>
>> I know this has probably been discussed before, but I'm just curious.
>>
>>
>>     
>
> >
>
>   


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to