On 9/21/07, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Come to think of it, given that most people will probably be using XHTML > rather then HTML, Hpricot::XML should probably be the default, with > Hpricot::HTML being an option.
I don't think Hpricot::XML and complicated rhtml templates would play along well. Some crazy erb could (I haven't checked this) make Hpricot::XML discard the document as invalid. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
