Hampton:
> Hrrrm, that's actually a really good idea.
>
> Once you just said it, it seems pretty obvious. Inline tags are a
> subset of tags that are pretty easy to define.
>
> +1 for how obvious of a solution this is.
>
> Double bonus points for anyone who can dream up a reasonable time when
> flattening these would go *wrong*.
>
> Also, anyone for a patch with tests?
>
> -hampton.
>
> PS: This isn't a commitment to the idea. I think about everything a
> lot before anything is added to the spec-in-my-head. But, its a
> positive first reactions on a beautiful Saturday morning.

Thanks hampton. I'd surely make a patch if i were more experienced
with ruby. Hope to see this in HAML. Then it'll be really most
beautiful output as i see it :)


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to