David- Yeah, we'd definitely be interested in learning more about that.
Anything to make our baby faster! Have any good links on the subject? -hampton. On 11/3/07, David Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > First, the disclaimer. I haven't used HAML or Sass in about 2 > projects. It looks like you guys have done a lot to make things zippy > in the last little while. > > Here's another 2 cents to add to the discussion. I'm at RubyConf > right now, and the discussion on ropes really was interesting for this > kind of problem. They were talking about Erb as a good place to apply > ropes, for performance reasons. Is this something you'd be interested > in applying? > > The basic idea is that a string can be stored as a tree internally. > Operations like parsing, appending, finding, etc. are much faster with > ropes than with strings. > > The Confreaks guys have captured RubyConf on video, so anyone should > be able to see the whole ropes discussion soon. There were also some > other base data types discussed in the room at the conference that > could be useful. > > Anyway, this looks like it'd be a productive conversation to have. > > Cheers, > > David > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
