One big problem with this is that it would break all pre-existing Haml
code out there, unless for some reason they never used elements or text
nodes. Also, it would invalidate the manual use of HTML, although I
suppose that could be added as a special case. Really, though, I think I
prefer the current way of doing it. It just feels right.
weepy wrote:
> haha - was it such a bad idea that it didn't warrant a reply ? !
>
> *...(
>
> On Nov 7, 8:36 am, weepy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I know I'll probably get shot down for this (especially so late in the
>> day :)
>>
>> I was just looking at my Haml and noticing that I don't use plain text
>> nodes that often compared with -, = and %
>>
>> So in the interests of simplicity and DRYness, would it be a good idea
>> to assume that no special character is a tag and use another control
>> character for text nodes.
>>
>> So :
>>
>> %h1#game_name
>> %span#users
>> = render :partial => "versus", :locals => {:game => @game}
>> %ul#user_colors
>> %li White
>> %li Black
>>
>> would become
>>
>> h1#game_name
>> span#users
>> = render :partial => "versus", :locals => {:game => @game}
>> ul#user_colors
>> li > White
>> li > Black
>>
>> where I've arbitrarily chosen > to mean text node
>>
>> Fire away
>>
>> *...(
>>
>
>
> >
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
