Right, exactly. sbtodd wrote: > Thats pretty clever .. so the thought is that you could get rid > of all access to the models .. or method in the model .. > so that the user cant wipe out the > database? > > HAML is fun ... made a whole model/controller with it > > On Nov 15, 7:37 pm, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Oh, yeah, I get it now. This would definitely be possible, but you'd >> have to be a little careful - just raw Haml would let them execute >> arbitrary Ruby code, which I'm not sure you want. You can use the >> :suppress_eval option to avoid this, but that might keep them away from >> too much stuff... they won't be able to use helpers and so forth. I >> think the best option is to wrap it in a Freaky Freaky Sandbox >> (http://code.whytheluckystiff.net/sandbox/) so you can control exactly >> what they can do. >> >> sbtodd wrote: >> >>> For instance, lets say that you wrote a multi-user blog application in >>> Rails >>> .. would it be possible for a user to create the look for their >>> blog based on HAML instead of Liquid? >>> >>> On Nov 15, 6:14 pm, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm not sure what you mean... themes for what? >>>> >>>> sbtodd wrote: >>>> >>>>> Could HAML be used for users to generate there own theme >>>>> > > > >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
