Certainly we run HAML as a plugin inside all of our rails apps, but I've not tried it with HAML 1.9 yet.
Re the "vendor everything" - I'm a big fan due to the ease for installation into a new environment (eg some developer machine) or an old environment which might have other unwanted versions of the gems installed. On 03/12/2007, Tom Stuart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 3 Dec 2007, at 04:48, Nathan Weizenbaum wrote: > > The gem should be installed with RubyGems - it shouldn't be anywhere > > in > > your application. > > People are increasingly keen to "vendor everything" ( > http://errtheblog.com/post/2120 > ), and I can't see why Haml couldn't/shouldn't work in that setup, but > of course it's not Haml's problem if people's Rails projects aren't > correctly set up to load it from vendor, which looks like it might be > the case here. > > Cheers, > -Tom > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
