Bob Aman wrote:
> The most common issue with the code I've written that I ported to work
> with 1.9 was stuff like:
>
> "asdf"[0] == 97
>
> Change that to either:
>
> "asdf"[0..0] == "a"
>
> Or:
>
> "asdf"[0] == 97 || "asdf"[0] == "a"
>
> Similar tricks exist for pretty much all of the incompatibilities.
> Converting over is usually a matter of running tests, and adding in
> workarounds for the places that break.
Luckily, character stuff isn't much of a problem, 'cause we use the ?a 
character literal syntax that's compatible with both versions. The main 
stress points seem to be string-iteration stuff (string.each as opposed 
to string.each_line) and dependencies. We use both ActionPack and 
hpricot in tests, and I think neither of them is working with 1.9 at the 
moment.

- Nathan

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to