Actually no if this is to be trusted http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/forms.html#h-17.12.1 (ie. the valid html form of a disabled input would be <input disabled>)
Anyway I got my answer on another thread - It makes sense to avoid dealing with all the quirks of html4. On Jan 7, 3:25 pm, "Mislav Marohnić" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 7, 2008 3:19 PM, pangel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I was stuck in my html4 mindset, with which it is valid. No html > > generation with haml? > > Just find a way to turn off the trailing slash and you've got yourself valid > HTML 4. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
