ok, thanks a lot for the helpful answers. I guess this means we'll switch to xhtml 1.0 strict...
// eric On Jan 7, 6:04 pm, Evgeny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Regarding the doctype, > you can just write it in pure "html"-doctype style right there on the top of > your file ... haml will treat it like regular text and output it. > > On Jan 7, 2008 6:48 PM, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > No, Haml doesn't support HTML, only XHTML. HTML is actually really hard > > to generate, since it's so irregular - we'd have to add all sorts of > > special-case logic, which we don't want to do. > > > - Nathan > > > eric wrote: > > > hi, > > > I just converted soundcloud.com to haml. I love it, fantastic stuff. > > > Just one question: we'd actually prefer using html 4.01 strict instead > > > of xhtml 1.0 strict. > > > How can I generate the HTML 4.01 doctype and also leave self-closed > > > tags (br, meta, etc) without a tailing / ? > > > > regards // eric (soundcloud.com) > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
