I read that as saying that the value of the attribute doesn't matter. In 
fact, the document says that "Boolean attributes may legally take a 
single value: the name of the attribute itself (e.g., 
selected="selected")." I believe this is the same in XHTML - so a 
literal value of "false" is invalid, and doesn't mean anything. However, 
it looks like browsers treat it as a true value. So <input 
selected="false"> and <input> are equivalent in neither spec nor 
practice :-/.

However, I'm somewhat less reluctant to break code that's invalid in the 
first place, and I would like the inverse of => true to work 
intuitively. I'll talk to Hampton about this.

- Nathan

Mislav Marohnić wrote:
> Re: "Allow rendering of <input checked>-style attributes in HTML mode."
> http://github.com/nex3/haml/commit/ae3c44f574f6ef842850ede446e48e4f7bac0191
>
> %input{:selected => false}
>
> will render as:
>
> <input selected="false">
>
> The docs say that this is not equivalent to not rendering an 
> attribute. But, in fact, it is:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/intro/sgmltut.html#didx-boolean_attribute
>
>     Some attributes play the role of boolean variables (e.g., the
>     selected attribute for the OPTION element). Their appearance in
>     the start tag of an element implies that the value of the
>     attribute is "true". Their absence implies a value of "false".
>
>
> This is HTML4. It has not changed in XHTML, except that the minimized 
> form is not allowed anymore.
>
> Because <input selected="false"> and <input> are equivalent, I propose 
> that %input{:selected => false} does not render the attribute at all. 
> We save space on complex forms and the semantics are unchanged anyway.
>
>
>
>
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to