Just for posterity's sake, I should probably note that this was resolved on IRC. Updating to the latest Haml fixed it.
Nex3 wrote: > Can you see if this breaks with the newest Haml revision? I may have > added something that fixed it. > > If not, could you use git bisect (there are a bunch of tutorials if > you Google for it) to find the Haml revision where the error first > occured? > > On Mar 26, 9:24 am, Eugenol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 18 mar, 01:37, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> Can you use git bisect to figure out what revision this appeared in? >>> >>> It looks like this has something to do with Haml's interaction with >>> Rails in particular. Haml's yield support on its own seems to be working >>> fine:http://pastie.caboo.se/167056. And I'd rather not set up a Rails >>> project just to get this to show up, so if you could debug, I'd be very >>> greatful. >>> >> Your pastie code works. Then maybe haml breaks the content_for >> helper ? What can provide you ? >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
