This extension should be trivial, as long as the code doesn't care about
the type of the Tree::Nodes contained in the mixin.
Thomas Reynolds wrote:
> Just wanted to chime on the usefulness of css mixins and to ask for
> the scope of this feature to be expanded.
>
> I'm working on the CSS side trying to style code generated by .NET.
> Obviously, getting a special class added to those elements is very
> difficult without bugging a developer and in my opinion, the style
> should be as independent of the specifics of the markup as possible.
>
> So basically I need to apply the clearfix hack to a bunch of floated
> elements. I could copy and paste this over and over and change the
> selector for each element:
> .clearfix:after { content: "."; display: block; height: 0; clear:
> both; visibility: hidden; }
> .clearfix { display:inline-block; }
> * html .clearfix { height: 1px ;}
>
> However, I'd much rather make the whole thing a module and just have
> sass insert my current selector in place of the .clearfix part.
>
> #elem1, #elem2. #elem3
> +clearfix
>
> Now, it looks to me that even with this patch that this still wouldn't
> work. It seems to operate on only one node of css rules, not a tree.
> So I would ask that the - prefixed selector could contain a whole tree
> of CSS beneath it that would also be included.
>
> Something like this
> - clearfix
> display: inline-block
> &:after
> content: "."
> display: block
> height: 0
> clear: both
> visibility: hidden
> * html &
> height: 1px
>
> #form
> input
> +clearfix
>
> Thanks guys, loving Sass.
> >
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
