Brilliant. On Apr 4, 2008, at 9:02 AM, Garry Hill wrote:
> > > In a spirit of adventure I made the test a little more involved: > > http://pastie.org/175333 > > Proving that mixins can include other mixins, which can themselves > include other mixins etc > > g > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
