This may be worth considering this as part of the compressed output style, but I think Mislav's concerns should be addressed. Is there really enough cases where you define the same rule in multiple places that it's worth adding the extra code to minimize the CSS? Might it be a better strategy to refactor the CSS in the first place?
Evgeny wrote: > It's all part of making the actual writing of the rules (in sass) clear, > but not really care how it will look like in the final css. > > I guess it's something like "compiling sass into css", allowing sass > to be more detailed and clear to read - while not really caring how the > final css will look like, since it's not the actual blue-print. > > There were request to make minimal html/css from haml/sass before, > where indentation and spacing is ignored in the final result to "save" > on the byte count. My idea is somewhat similar. > > Bye hey, I wont insist :) > > Regards, > > -- evgeny --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
