> It's not expected as such, but it is reasonable. What's happening is > that Haml takes everything to the left of the =, assigns a variable to > it, and calls to_s.
Sure, that makes sense. > When you evaluate > > foo = "bar", "baz" > > foo becomes > > ["bar", "baz"] You know, I didn't know you could implicitly create an Array like that. That's cool. Thanks for the explanation. -- Chris Boone, Hypsometry http://hypsometry.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
