Alright, it's been much more than a week. Has anyone found this feature
useful? In light of Olek's point about how easy it is to do this without
additional syntax, I'm inclined to take it out, but if anyone has any
arguments in its favor, speak up.
- Nathan
Nathan Weizenbaum wrote:
> This is an interesting note - in general, although
>
> %foo[obj, :prefix]
>
> is somewhat more elegant,
>
> %foo{:id => :prefix, :class => :prefix}[obj]
>
> is functionally equivalent. I had forgotten about that. I'm not sure
> it's worth adding new syntax for something that's not too painful to
> do without it.
>
> - Nathan
>
> Olek Poplavsky wrote:
>> I needed similar functionality couple days ago, and I found that this
>> also worked for me with 1.8.2:
>>
>> %tr{ :id => 'sub', :class => cycle('even', 'odd') }[sub_channel]
>>
>> that resulted in output
>>
>> <tr class='channel odd' id='sub_channel_97'>
>>
>> 'prefix' syntax is surely more elegant, I vote for it. My current
>> solution, on the other side allows using prefixes for id, but not for
>> class, which is desirable in this case.
>>
>> regards,
>> Olek
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2008, at 5:25 PM, Nathan Weizenbaum wrote:
>>> Hey folks,
>>>
>>> Stefano Cobianchi forked Haml a couple days ago and added support
>>> for prefix arguments to the object-ref tag component. This means you
>>> can do
>>>
>>> %p[post, :prefix]
>>>
>>> and this will generate
>>>
>>> <p class='prefix_post' id='prefix_post_#{id}'>
>>>
>>> I've merged this into master tentatively. Try it out, let us know if
>>> it's useful. If it is, we'll keep it in, if not, we'll leave it out.
>>>
>>> - Nathan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> >>
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
