This is really odd. Haml doesn't have any say in when the templates are 
recompiled; that's all left up to Rails.

The only thing I can think is to report this to the Rails folks.

Alan Harper wrote:
> Testing with erb was probably one of those obvious steps huh? No, with
> erb it does the right thing.
>
> Just to clarify what I mean by caching, the site doesn't use any caching at 
> all.
>
> 

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to