Correct. It is not valid haml syntax. 2008/10/20 PEZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > What should happen with this: > > %ul > % > .foo > % > .bar > > At current it gives a syntax error. Maybe that's how it should be? > > /PEZ > > On Oct 19, 3:14 pm, "Mislav Marohnić" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 14:58, Mislav Marohnić < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > Making the "guess" syntax will probably require much more > monkeypatching. > > > > I lied. It wasn't so hard (gist updated) > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
