There's no need to make haml more complicated by adding redundant
functionality.
If you can't use a runtime framework, you should look into using
staticmatic.
Chris
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Lex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> @John Schult
>
> I think you're missing the point entirely. This is not an
> optimization, technically it will only slow things down because it's
> syntactic sugar. That's all that HAML is: syntactic sugar for HTML. By
> NOT relying on your framework's 'helpers' and 'partials' and
> incorporating it into the templating system, you DEcouple this
> functionality from a specific framework.
>
> BTW part of my drive for this is that I don't use a framework. Well, I
> do use Rack. Rack and HAML.
>
> Here's specifically what I'm talking about because it doesn't seem to
> be 'clicking'... yes it's contrived, but should get the point across:
>
> [index.html.haml]
> %html
> %head
> ^common/head{ :title => 'PseudoHAML' }
> %body
> ^common/pagehead{ :heading => 'A stupid little demo' }
> %p
> This text is unique to this page
>
>
> [common/head.html.haml]
> %meta{ 'http-equiv' => 'Content-Type', 'content' => 'application/xhtml
> +xml;charset=utf-8' }
> %title= @title
>
>
> [common/pagehead.html.haml]
> .header
> %img{ :src => '/images/header.png' }
> %h1= @heading
>
>
> # renders as
>
>
> <html>
> <head>
> <meta content="application/xhtml+xml;charset=utf-8" http-
> equiv="Content-Type" />
> <title>PseudoHaml</title>
> </head>
> <body>
> <div class="header">
> <img src="/images/header.png" />
> <h1>A stupid little demo</h1>
> </div>
> <p>
> This text is unique to this page
> </p>
> </body>
> </html>
>
>
>
> nothing more, nothing less
>
>
> On Oct 23, 4:30 pm, John Schult <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Oct 23, 5:18 pm, PEZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I like this idea a lot! It speaks hamlish the way I interpreted it
> > > when I stumbled across it the other day. Markup should be beautiful!
> >
> > > Maybe it would be possible to use two chars? Like:
> >
> > > %%foo{ :localvar => @vartobind }
> >
> > Sure, if you are using Rails. I'm not, I use Merb. IMO Haml should
> > not include specific framework helper "optimization". Really? Is it
> > that hard to type out:
> >
> > = partial :header
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > John Schult
> >
> > --
> > Be kind, stop top posting! http://bit.ly/4nErpi
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
