> We're currently considering alternative, more concise attribute syntaxes.
What are the alternative sytnaxes that you are considering ?
On 12 Nov, 17:22, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We're currently considering alternative, more concise attribute syntaxes.
>
> weepy wrote:
> > or perhaps square brackets would be better ?
>
> > #td[colspan="2" style="color: red"]
>
> > (note that I even made a mistake in my conversion to ruby in the first
> > example!)
>
> > On 12 Nov, 10:55, weepy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> The only thing in HAML that I find is a PITA is having to specify
> >> attributes as a hash.
> >> This is particularily annoying when converting some HTML -> HAML (yes
> >> I know there's a converter - but it's not always that straight forward
> >> e.g. if it's actually ERB) :)
>
> >> Would it be possible to do something like
>
> >> #td(colspan="2" style="color: red")
>
> >> as an alternative to
>
> >> #td{ :colspan=>"2" :style=>"color: red"}
>
> >> ?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
