Sorry it bungled your ApplicationHelper overrides... that definitely shouldn't happen.
However, it does check for Rails to be installed... and personally, I find it *really* helpful in doing Haml-style development in Rails. Classing your body tag is a must-have for Haml/Sass developers... sure its 3 lines, but should we all repeat them? On Nov 22, 5:58 pm, railsjedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. I recently ran into a problem on Rails 2.2 where the page_class in > Haml is overwriting my page_class helper in application_helpers.rb. > > I'm investigating a fix in the Rails core, but I'm also curious... > does this page_class helper really need to be in haml? Seems like it > would be a good change to get rid of that action_view_extensions > altogether. It's Rails specific, and doesnt do anything thats core to > Haml. If someone needed it, it would be a 3 liner in their > application_helper.rb. > > Thanks --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
