div_for seems to be not working either. On Nov 23, 1:00 pm, railsjedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, I tracked all my frustrations with haml helpers down to an > incompatibility in content_tag between Rails 2.2 and Haml 2.0.5 > > When I try rendering this call in my haml view, nothing shows up: > > - content_tag :div do > SHOW ME SOME CONTENT > > I tried this both on Haml 2.0.4 and the latest Haml Edge (0a14c3) both > install via plugins. In all cases the content doesnt display. > > Here is a test project that demonstrates the problem. Use it with Haml > 2.0.4 and Rails 2.2 and you'll see the content doesnt display in Haml. > On Rails 2.1 however, it will work fine. > > http://s3.amazonaws.com/railsjedi/hamlbug_rails22.zip > > Traced the problem down to the content_tag alias method chaining in > lib/haml/helpers/action_view_mods.rb > > I've added a unit test that isolates the bug as well as a fix for the > issue in Rails 2.2. If you are running into this error when using Haml > with Rails 2.2, give it a try. It should resolve your > problems.http://github.com/jcnetdev/haml/commit/bc27e25fcafedb85ce37d818d28721... > > Hope this helps. Be great to get a patch for this into 2.0.5 soon > before more Rails 2.2 users run into this issue. > > On Nov 19, 11:19 pm, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > All the ERB helpers should work with Haml - if they don't, that's a bug. > > The Haml helpers do require Haml, so you should avoid using them in a > > mixed environment. The reason things like haml_concat and capture_haml > > exist is to provide something for non-Rails environments. > > > railsjedi wrote: > > > Hi. I'm trying to write some view helpers that take blocks. Running > > > into the issue that some views are HAML and some are ERB. So erb seems > > > to break haml_tag, and haml seems to break content_tag. Also concat vs > > > haml_concat, and capture vs capture_haml. All very confusing. Seems > > > like helpers should be halpers, and work in all contexts no matter the > > > view layer. > > > > Is there an easy way to convert from one to the other? Maybe by just > > > wrapping it in a capture block or something? > > > > Thanks
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
