I remember that was a bug that got fixed a couple months ago. I still think you're loading the wrong version in rails. There should be no functional difference between your rails environment and the command line when it comes to basic syntax. chris
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 9:47 PM, s.ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's weirder: > This may be a misunderstanding of the syntax on my part. I thought that > the declaration: > =sprite(!x=0px, !y=0px) > :background transparent url(/images/sprite.png) no-repeat scroll 0% > :background-position= !x !y > > would allow me to call the mixin with 0, 1, or 2 arguments and use the 0px > as defaults. And that is indeed the behavior I observe from the command > line. > > +sprite > > generates the expected CSS with the defaults populated into > background-position. With Rails, the mixin works fine with the arguments > supplied, but fails if they are omitted. > > Am I missing something here? > > Steve > > > On Nov 28, 2008, at 9:39 PM, Chris Eppstein wrote: > > You know, I run haml & sass vendored in my rails app, I don't do the gem > thing because I'm not usually running a released version. > Just do a git checkout into vendor/plugins/haml and the init script should > grab that code instead of the gem. > > -chris > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 9:28 PM, s.ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> It's at: >> http://pastie.org/326501 >> >> This is just an excerpt. The bug shows up immediately. Here's the weird >> part. Assume the file is called application.sass. If I do: >> >> sass application.sass >> >> everything works just as you would expect clean translation to stdout. If >> I run Rails, then I get the problem I described. So I checked to see what >> obsolescent versions of the haml gem might be installed. Well, plenty of old >> ones, so I cleaned all of them out, created a new gem package off github, >> installed, and same behavior. Ok from command line, not from Rails. >> >> ??? >> >> --steve >> >> >> On Nov 28, 2008, at 7:49 PM, Chris Eppstein wrote: >> >> Glad you like compass. >> Can you paste the code online so I can try it out? >> -c >> >> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 7:36 PM, s.ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Chris-- >>> >>> [topquoting to be more iPhone-friendly] I'm running Haml version >>> 2.0.4. I thought the changes for mixins happened around 2.0.3 but I >>> could be wrong. I updated from github (and Haml version is 2.1.0!) but >>> even then the same problem occurs: Sass::SyntaxError: Undefined mixin >>> 'sprite'. That would be on this exact line of code: >>> >>> #navigation >>> li >>> => +sprite >>> >>> >>> BTW: Great work on Compass. Truly impressive stuff. >>> >>> --steve >>> >>> >>> On Nov 28, 2008, at 4:13 PM, Chris Eppstein wrote: >>> >>> > >>> > Hi Steve, >>> > Your mixins look fine. What version of haml do you have installed? >>> > You need to be running off the master branch of haml to use mixin >>> > arguments. >>> > >>> > Regarding your second question, SassScript is certainly capable of >>> > expressing manipulation of arguments. Take a look at compass's grid >>> > module for an example. That said, be careful not to trade too much >>> > clarity for DRYness. That's a judgement call, of course. >>> > >>> > -chris >>> > >>> > Hunt & pecked on my iPhone... Sorry if it's brief! >>> > >>> > On Nov 28, 2008, at 3:45 PM, "s.ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > >>> >> >>> >> After looking over Compass a bit, it looked like a good time to >>> >> revisit some of my monolithic CSS. I wanted to create a mixin for >>> >> background positioning: >>> >> >>> >> =sprite(!x=0px, !y=0px) >>> >> :background url(/some/place/my/png/lives.png) no-repeat >>> >> :background-position !x !y >>> >> >>> >> And then: >>> >> >>> >> .accept-button >>> >> +sprite(-320px, -440px) >>> >> >>> >> Without the arguments everything is dandy, but when I add the >>> >> arguments, the sprite mixin is not found. Bonus question: As all my >>> >> offsets are negative and specified in pixels, it would be great to >>> >> just write: >>> >> >>> >> +sprite(320, 440) >>> >> >>> >> Is that level of interpolation possible? >>> >> >>> >> Any help appreciated! >>> >> >>> >> Steve >>> >> >>> >>> >>> > >>> > > >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
